Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martin Klizan vs Ulises Blanch Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Klizan vs Blanch analysis and find out who is favored!
Martin Klizan vs Ulises Blanch Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Klizan 1 - 0 Blanch
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Klizan has won 52.78% of points on their second serve, while Blanch has won 47.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Klizan, in recent form, has won 54.81% of their opponent's second serve points, while Blanch has won 55.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.53% and 30.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Klizan has saved 61.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Blanch has saved 67.01% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Klizan has won 87.18% of matches played (W/L 34/ 5), with Blanch winning 62.86% (W/L 22/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Klizan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 309/ 174), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 4/ 15). Blanch has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 86/ 80).
- Player level: In the last year, Klizan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 88.89% of matches (W/L 32/ 4), where as Blanch has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 15/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Klizan winning 1 times and Blanch being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Klizan winning 2 and Blanch winning 1. The last match between Klizan and Blanch was at the Nur-Sultan 1 Challenger, 24-02-2021, Second, I.hard with Martin Klizan getting the victory 6-7(7) 6-2 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:23:3.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Klizan and Blanch have played a deciding set 1 times, with Klizan winning 1 times and Blanch 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Klizan winning 1, and Blanch 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Klizan has played against opponents with an average rank of 239.03 while Blanch has played against players with an average rank of 217.51.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Klizan has won 88% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Blanch has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Klizan has converted 51.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Blanch has converted 37.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
480
Rank
24
High
34
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
501
Rank
236
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
59% (496-351)
Career Total W/L
53% (212-187)
89% (31-4)
YTD W/L
77% (10-3)
$2,947,100
Career Prize Money
$54,150
4
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Martin Klizan | Ulises Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:23:3 | 2:23:3 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (66/113) | 55% (52/95) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (51/66) | 79% (41/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (26/47) | 56% (24/43) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (30/95) | 32% (36/113) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(7) 6-2 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Martin Klizan
Player
Ulises Blanch
58%
(
66 of
113)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
95)
10
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
2
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
36 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
95)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martin Klizan | Ulises Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 89% (31/4) | 77% (10/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 80% (61/15) | 65% (20/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 63% (415/241) | 53% (156/139) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 85% (11/2) | 77% (10/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 95% (18/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.64 |
| Aces Total | 79 | 92 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.44 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 63 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:22 | 1:52:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 266.34 | 195 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1051/1779) | 59% (562/949) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (757/1051) | 74% (415/562) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (381/728) | 47% (182/387) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (111/222) | 38% (39/103) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (810/1773) | 40% (378/956) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Futures W/L | 91% (29/3) | 78% (7/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 88% (29/33) | 77% (10/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 88% (7/8) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 96% (28/27) | 100% (9/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 4% (28/1) | 0% (9/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 57% (7/4) | 25% (4/1) |
Martin Klizan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Jelle Sels
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Giovanni Fonio
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Andrea Picchione
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Federico Bondioli
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Kai Wehnelt
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Nicola Kuhn
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Andrea Collarini
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
72%
(
64 of
89)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
100
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Miguel Damas
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Adria Soriano Barrera
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Tristan Mccormick
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ulises Blanch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Ulises Blanch
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Saba Purtseladze
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
12
Aces
18
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Ben Jones
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Giorgi Giorgadze
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Ulises Blanch
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
12
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Robert Strombachs
58%
(
76 of
130)
1st Serve %
76%
(
79 of
104)
15
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
6
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
55 of
79)
54%
(
29 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
38%
(
50 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Luca Castagnola
52%
(
51 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Matej Dodig
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
30 of
34)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
81
|
0-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Louis Dussin
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Klizan Vs Blanch Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
